The Shore

The Shore
Showing posts with label conrad black. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conrad black. Show all posts

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Majority of Americans support the legalization of marijuana, Economist says.




According to this article, in the Economist, 
A huge majority of Americans, more than two to one once don’t knows have been excluded, support the legalisation and taxation of marijuana. Even without excluding the don’t knows, a clear majority favours treating the drug equivalently to tobacco and alcohol.

It also concludes that: 

If our poll is right, then it can only be a matter of time before laws start to change, at least in the more liberal states.
The poll is interesting, but I did think of equivalencies from the past. . .

E.g. During the heatlh care debate it was clear that the MAJORITY of  Americans wanted real health care reform, but the law makers - affected no doubt by the lobbyists from big-pharma, private hospitals and insurance companies were convinced, by lobbyists,  that doom and gloom were the only possible outcomes (or maybe American Politicians are literally just corrupt and giving into bribes - esp in the form of donations to their re-election campaigns) See, for example: this article from Physicians for a National Health Program
Once you explain health care reform to Americans - they support it.

So, I suspect that since legalizing marijuana would have a number of positive effects on the general population - fewer people, especially young people with criminal records, fewer people in prison, fewer people gumming up the court system etc. All of these factors reducing costs that must be born by taxpayers.  That is, it is not just the potential tax revenue. . .   Anyway, I can see that "the people" will want to legalize it (personally I wish it were not regulated for personal use - except maybe by limiting what you could grow - to avoid large scale operations - so that one could grow 6-8 plants for personal use without having to resort to buying from the state - but that debate is for another day. . . much like you can make wine and consume it but not sell it.) but that there are "interests" in society that oppose it, in self-interest.

Anyway, the legalization of marijuana has a negative effect on some parts of the economy and might reduce the need for or reduce the expansion of prisons, policing, courts, and even other medications.  So, who do you figure is lobbying against the legalization and regulation of marijuana?  Llikely those companies that build and operate private prisons, those that make a living from the courts and that need or want large volumes of cases  and those that sell drugs that a cheap or home grown marijuana could replace.

As a result I am not expecting legalization or regulation, in the U.S.  any time soon -

Canadians seem to be split on the issue of legalization in most polls, but it seem more likely to happen here first. . . though not with the present government!   They apparently want to lock up as many people as possible and put them into private, for profit prisons - I am guessing owned by their friends or people they want for some reason to impress - the market should not be in the business of prisons!!!!

I remember once before linking to an article by Conrad Black about how private prisons are bad - and I have read information by Marc Emory (Prince of Pot) who is currently incarcerated in an American private prison - which he claims does not operate according to the rules set out for prisons in the U.S. - but since one is a "prisoner" there is no place to complain.

I think legalized and regulated marijuana would be a good thing - unlike most Canadians though I would like to see all drug problems treated like a health problem and not a criminal one -



Saturday, May 29, 2010

Conrad Black, Maoists in India, G20 Security




Musing on Conrad Black today - given his correct analysis (mostly) in the National Post (front page!) today, I think that part of the cure for what ails us, is to send the rich to jail for a while. . . where they learn things like - everyone behind bars in not guilty of a crime, people deserve to be treated with dignity even in jail. . .

Speaking to a three year old report on the government's plan on what to do with Canadian prisons Black says: "As so often in other fields, this document seeks to import to Canada much of the worst of American practice, and none of the best, unless Canada now idealizes gratuitous official severity." and, he claims, he knows whereof he speaks having spent considerable time in American prisons with the approach (punishment, not rehab, treat them like they are guilty until proven innocent . . .) now being proposed by the Harper government.

Black says in this article in part:

This Roadmap--which was released in 2007, and which the Harper government began officially responding to in its budget in 2008, setting out a five-year plan -- turns the humane traditions of Canada upside down. It implicitly assumes that all who are convicted are guilty and have no remaining claim to decency from the state, and that treating confinees accordingly is in the interest of the legally unexceptionable majority.

The Roadmap does not mention prisoners' rights, beyond basic food, shelter, clothing and medical care, and assumes that they are probably not recoverable for society and that the longer they are imprisoned, the better it is for society. Almost no distinction is made between violent and non-violent offenders.


Conrad black defending prisoners - imagine! He also says that the unborn have rights in a sentence in the middle of the article, and he holds other views I find abhorrent, but this was amusing, nevertheless.

___________________________________________________________________

Also musing about the Maoists in India. I was quite compelled by Arundhuti Roy's article in Outlook that defended the Maoists and their violence, see here, because they are defending those without rights or privilege in India and the movement is growing especially among the "tribal people". Several articles have been published lately that were very sympathetic to the Maoists or Naxalites as they are known in India. Their previous violence though has targeted police, military, paramilitary and corporations. There has been some (but little) collateral damage - killed civilians (and always because they were unluckily traveling on the same bus or train as lots of military or police. Now suddenly a civilian train travelling from Kolkata to Delhi is blown up, or the track was sabotaged, it seems to be still a little unclear - but it was clear that a last month, a bus load of police and security police wanna-be's was attacked and there were "civilian casualties" - although the bulk of deaths were police) and everyone is blaming the Maoists who have apparently only slaughtered (relatively) innocent civilians - what's the dealio?

Another article in Outlook here.
and here, questioning whether it was in fact, the Maoists.
Another story here from Al Jazeera
And lastly in the Guardian - UK supporting the struggle for the landless even if not the Naxalite methods. . .

U of T is shutting down for the G20 including sending students off campus, closing buildings including residences. A concern, see: http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/361.php